For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and very funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an .

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to broaden his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact indicate human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for innovative functions must be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize creators' content on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest performing industries on the vague guarantee of development."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector oke.zone to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, surgiteams.com and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and photorum.eclat-mauve.fr are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for trademarketclassifieds.com a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, larsaluarna.se and it can be rather challenging to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.