Expert System (AI) is revolutionizing education while making discovering more available however also sparking arguments on its impact.

While students hail AI tools like ChatGPT for enhancing their knowing experience, lecturers are raising issues about the growing dependence on AI, which they argue fosters laziness and weakens scholastic stability, especially with lots of students unable to protect their tasks or offered works.

Prof. Isaac Nwaogwugwu, a speaker at the University of Lagos, in an interview with Nairametrics, expressed aggravation over the growing dependence on AI-generated actions among trainees recounting a current experience he had.

RelatedStories

Avoid sharing individual details that can determine you with AI tools- Expert warns

Chinese AI app DeepSeek triggers international tech selloff, forum.batman.gainedge.org difficulties U.S. AI supremacy

"I gave a project to my MBA trainees, and out of over 100 trainees, about 40% sent the specific same responses. These students did not even know each other, but they all used the exact same AI tool to create their actions," he said.

He noted that this trend is widespread amongst both undergraduate and postgraduate students however is particularly concerning in part-time and distance learning programs.

"AI is a serious obstacle when it pertains to tasks. Many students no longer believe critically-they just browse the web, create responses, and submit," he added.

Surprisingly, some lecturers are likewise accused of over-relying on AI, setting a cycle where both educators and students turn to AI for benefit rather than intellectual rigor.

This argument raises critical concerns about the role of AI in scholastic integrity and trainee advancement.

According to a UNESCO report, while ChatGPT reached 100 million regular monthly active users in January 2023, only one nation had actually released policies on generative AI since July 2023.

Since December 2024, ChatGPT had more than 300 million people utilizing the AI chatbot weekly and 1 billion messages sent out every day around the globe.

Decline of academic rigor

University lecturers are progressively concerned about trainees sending AI-generated tasks without genuinely comprehending the material.

Dr. Felix Echekoba, a lecturer at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, revealed his issues to Nairametrics about trainees significantly relying on ChatGPT, trademarketclassifieds.com just to battle with answering basic when checked.

"Many trainees copy from ChatGPT and send sleek tasks, however when asked standard questions, they go blank. It's frustrating because education has to do with finding out, not just passing courses," he said.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu explained that the increasing variety of top-notch graduates can not be entirely associated to AI but admitted that even high-performing students utilize these tools.
"A top-notch trainee is a superior trainee, AI or not, however that doesn't indicate they don't cheat. The benefits of AI may be peripheral, however it is making trainees dependent and less analytical," he said.

- Another lecturer, Dr. Ereke, from Ebonyi State University, raised a various issue that some lecturers themselves are guilty of the very same practice.
"It's not simply students utilizing AI lazily. Some speakers, out of their own laziness, generate lesson notes, course outlines, marking schemes, and even exam questions with AI without reviewing them. Students in turn use AI to create answers. It's a cycle of laziness and it is killing genuine knowing," he lamented.

Students' viewpoints on usage

Students, on the other hand, say AI has actually enhanced their knowing experience by making academic materials more easy to understand and available.

- Eniola Arowosafe, a 300-level Business Administration student at Unilag, shared how AI has considerably assisted her knowing by breaking down complex terms and supplying summaries of prolonged texts.
"AI assisted me comprehend things more quickly, specifically when dealing with intricate subjects," she discussed.

However, she recalled an instance when she used AI to submit her project, only for her speaker to instantly acknowledge that it was generated by ChatGPT and reject it. Eniola noted that it was a good-bad result.

- Bryan Okwuba, who just recently graduated with a superior degree in Pharmacy Technology from the University of Lagos, firmly thinks that his scholastic success wasn't due to any AI tool. He attributes his exceptional grades to actively engaging by asking questions and concentrating on locations that speakers highlight in class, as they are frequently reflected in exam questions.
"It's all about existing, paying attention, and tapping into the wealth of knowledge shared by my colleagues," he stated,

- Tunde Awoshita, a final-year marketing student at UNIZIK, confesses to occasionally copying directly from ChatGPT when facing several deadlines.
"To be truthful, there are times I copy directly from ChatGPT when I have numerous due dates, and I know I'm guilty of that, most times the lecturers don't get to check out them, however AI has likewise helped me learn faster."

Balancing AI's role in education

Experts believe the option depends on AI literacy; mentor students and speakers how to use AI as a knowing aid instead of a faster way.

- Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, highlighted the combination of AI into Nigeria's education system, stressing the importance of a well balanced technique that keeps human participation while utilizing AI to enhance learning outcomes.
"As we navigate the rapidly evolving landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI), it is vital that we prioritise human company in education. We need to ensure that AI enhances, instead of replaces, educators' crucial function in shaping young minds," he said

Concerns over AI in Learning

Dorcas Akintade, a cybersecurity change expert, dealt with growing concerns regarding the use of expert system (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and their possible risks to the educational system.

- She acknowledged the benefits of AI, however, highlighted the need for care in its usage.
- Akintade highlighted the increasing resistance amongst educators and schools towards including AI tools in discovering environments. She identified two main reasons that AI tools are dissuaded in academic settings: security threats and plagiarism. She explained that AI tools like ChatGPT are trained to react based on user interactions, which may not align with the expectations of educators.
"It is not looking at it as a tutor," Akintade stated, discussing that AI does not accommodate specific teaching approaches.

Plagiarism is another issue, as AI pulls from existing data, frequently without correct attribution

"A lot of people require to understand, like I said, this is information that has actually been trained on. It is not simply bringing things out from the sky. It's bringing details that some other people are fed into it, which in essence indicates that is another individual's documentation," she cautioned.

- Additionally, Akintade highlighted an early problem in AI advancement called "hallucination," where AI tools would create information that was not accurate.
"Hallucination implied that it was drawing out information from the air. If ChatGPT could not get that details from you, it was going to make one up," she discussed.

She advised "grounding" AI by providing it with specific info to avoid such errors.

Navigating AI in Education

Akintade argued that prohibiting AI tools outright is not the option, especially when AI provides an opportunity to leapfrog conventional instructional methods.

- She believes that regularly reinforcing key info assists individuals keep in mind and prevent making errors when faced with challenges.
"Immersion brings conversion. When you tell individuals the exact same thing over and over again, when they will make the mistakes, then they'll keep in mind."

She also empasized the need for clear policies and procedures within schools, keeping in mind that many schools should deal with the people and procedure aspects of this usage.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu has resorted to in-class projects and tests to counter AI-driven scholastic dishonesty.
"Now, I generally use projects to make sure students offer original work." However, he acknowledged that handling large classes makes this technique challenging.

"If you set intricate questions, trainees won't have the ability to use AI to get direct answers," he discussed.

He stressed the requirement for universities to train speakers on crafting test concerns that AI can not easily solve while acknowledging that some lecturers battle to counter AI misuse due to a lack of technological awareness. "Some lecturers are analogue," he stated.

- Nigeria released a draft National AI Strategy in August 2024, focusing on ethical AI development with fairness, transparency, responsibility, vetlek.ru and privacy at its core.
- UNESCO in a report requires the guideline of AI in education, recommending organizations to examine algorithms, parentingliteracy.com information, and outputs of generative AI tools to guarantee they fulfill ethical requirements, safeguard user information, and filter improper material.
- It stresses the requirement to assess the long-term impact of AI on vital abilities like believing and imagination while creating policies that align with ethical frameworks. Additionally, UNESCO recommends executing age constraints for GenAI usage to safeguard more youthful trainees and safeguard susceptible groups.
- For federal governments, it encouraged adopting a collaborated national technique to controling GenAI, consisting of developing oversight bodies and lining up guidelines with existing data defense and privacy laws. It highlights evaluating AI risks, enforcing more stringent guidelines for prazskypantheon.cz high-risk applications, and making sure nationwide data ownership.